Annual Pension Solvency and Performance Report

State Pension System Rankings

Interactive analysis of state pension system performance across five key metrics.

Interactive State Rankings Map

Click on any state to view detailed pension system analysis and grades. States are color-coded by their 2024 funded ratio.

AKMEVTNHWAIDMTNDMNMINYMARIORUTWYSDIAWIINOHPANJCTCANVCONEMOILKYWVVAMDDEAZNMKSARTNNCSCOKLAMSALGAHITXFL
≥100% Funded
90-99% Funded
80-89% Funded
70-79% Funded
60-69% Funded
<60% Funded

State Pension System Rankings by Key Metrics

Detailed rankings across five critical pension system performance indicators.

Understanding the Rankings

Table 1: State Pension Rankings by Funded Status

This table ranks states based on their current funded status, measured by the difference between their market value of assets and accrued liabilities. The higher the funded ratio, the healthier and more secure a pension system is.

Table 2: State Pension Rankings by Investment Performance (2001-2024)

This table ranks states based on their long-term investment performance, measured by the difference between their 2001-2024 average return and their 2024 assumed rate of return (ARR). A positive surplus indicates that average returns exceeded the state's current benchmark.

Table 3: State Pension Rankings by Contribution Rate Adequacy

This table ranks states based on their "Benchmark 20" rate, which is the calculated contribution amount needed to pay off unfunded liabilities over 20 years. A lower benchmark rate indicates a smaller underfunding problem, resulting in a higher ranking.

Table 4: State Pension Rankings by Asset Allocation Risk

This table ranks states based on the risk profile of their investment portfolios. The ranking is determined by the total percentage of assets allocated to higher-risk alternative investments, including real estate, hedge funds, private equity, commodities, and other alternatives. A higher rank indicates a more conservative, lower-risk strategy, while a lower rank signifies a higher-risk portfolio.

Table 5: State Pension Rankings by Probability of Hitting Assumed Return

This table ranks states based on the forecasted probability that their pension systems will meet or exceed their assumed rates of return over a 20-year period. A higher rank indicates a greater likelihood of achieving investment targets.

Table 1: State Pension Rankings by Funded Status

RankStateUAL (Billions)Funded Ratio
1Tennessee$-2.9B
104%
2Washington$-4.5B
103%
3South Dakota$0B
100%
4Utah$2.6B
95%
5Wisconsin$8.6B
94%
6New York$44.8B
94%
7Nebraska$1.7B
93%
8Iowa$4.3B
92%
9West Virginia$1.8B
91%
10Maine$2.6B
88%
11Delaware$1.9B
88%
12Minnesota$13B
88%
13North Carolina$20.2B
86%
14Idaho$3.7B
86%
15Oklahoma$7.9B
85%
16Wyoming$2B
85%
17Arkansas$7.4B
84%
18Virginia$24.5B
84%
19Florida$43.9B
82%
20California$264.7B
82%
21Missouri$20.8B
81%
22Texas$91.1B
80%
23Georgia$33.1B
80%
24Oregon$22.4B
79%
25Ohio$60.4B
79%
26Indiana$11.6B
79%
27Nevada$18.1B
78%
28Louisiana$18.3B
77%
29Michigan$35.6B
75%
30Montana$4.7B
75%
31Arizona$27.3B
74%
32Maryland$30.5B
73%
33Kansas$11.4B
72%
34Alaska$7.4B
71%
35North Dakota$3.3B
70%
36Alabama$21.7B
70%
37Colorado$29.8B
70%
38New Hampshire$5.7B
69%
39Vermont$3.4B
67%
40Massachusetts$44.1B
66%
41Pennsylvania$66.6B
66%
42New Mexico$18.4B
66%
43Rhode Island$6.1B
65%
44Hawaii$14.1B
63%
45South Carolina$27.7B
62%
46Connecticut$37.3B
60%
47Mississippi$26.6B
56%
48New Jersey$92B
55%
49Kentucky$39.6B
54%
50Illinois$200.9B
52%

Table 2: State Pension Rankings by Investment Performance (2001-2024)

RankStateAvg Return (2001-2024)ARRReturn Surplus/Deficit
1Kansas8.54%7.01%
+1.53%
2Michigan6.79%6.13%
+0.66%
3Washington7.56%6.99%
+0.56%
4South Dakota6.95%6.53%
+0.42%
5New York6.51%6.55%
-0.04%
6Minnesota6.94%7%
-0.06%
7Pennsylvania6.91%6.98%
-0.06%
8Idaho6.2%6.3%
-0.1%
9Ohio6.85%7%
-0.15%
10Nevada7.07%7.25%
-0.18%
11New Hampshire6.55%6.75%
-0.2%
12West Virginia7.05%7.25%
-0.2%
13Illinois6.69%6.93%
-0.24%
14Florida6.45%6.7%
-0.25%
15Iowa6.78%7.03%
-0.26%
16Oregon6.59%6.89%
-0.3%
17Colorado6.9%7.24%
-0.34%
18Virginia6.4%6.76%
-0.36%
19Texas6.67%7.04%
-0.37%
20Nebraska6.66%7.03%
-0.37%
21Oklahoma6.57%6.95%
-0.38%
22Wyoming6.41%6.8%
-0.39%
23Kentucky6.25%6.69%
-0.44%
24Delaware6.55%7%
-0.45%
25Arkansas6.69%7.17%
-0.49%
26Massachusetts6.41%6.99%
-0.58%
27Missouri6.58%7.17%
-0.59%
28North Carolina5.91%6.5%
-0.6%
29Georgia6.29%6.91%
-0.61%
30Vermont6.37%7%
-0.63%
31Mississippi6.34%7%
-0.66%
32Tennessee6.31%6.99%
-0.67%
33Maine6.02%6.7%
-0.68%
34Wisconsin6.12%6.8%
-0.68%
35California6.22%6.92%
-0.7%
36Louisiana6.32%7.08%
-0.75%
37New Jersey6.22%7%
-0.78%
38South Carolina6.15%7%
-0.85%
39North Dakota5.96%6.84%
-0.88%
40Hawaii6.05%7%
-0.95%
41Alabama6.39%7.45%
-1.06%
42Rhode Island5.89%7%
-1.11%
43Arizona5.93%7.05%
-1.12%
44Connecticut5.78%6.9%
-1.12%
45Montana6.17%7.3%
-1.13%
46Indiana4.93%6.25%
-1.32%
47New Mexico5.79%7.12%
-1.34%
48Alaska5.81%7.25%
-1.44%
49Maryland5.39%6.85%
-1.46%
N/AUtahN/AN/A
N/A

Table 3: State Pension Rankings by Contribution Rate Adequacy

RankStateEmployer RateBenchmark RateContribution Rate Difference
1Louisiana31.8%18.4%
+13.4%
2West Virginia16.9%4.6%
+12.3%
3Maine11.8%1.3%
+10.4%
4Connecticut43%32.9%
+10.1%
5Michigan34.2%24.5%
+9.7%
6Oklahoma20.8%11.6%
+9.2%
7New Jersey33.6%26.2%
+7.4%
8North Carolina16.2%9%
+7.2%
9Indiana17.9%10.7%
+7.2%
10California32.4%25.4%
+7.1%
11Rhode Island27.7%20.7%
+7%
12South Carolina23.6%17.6%
+6.1%
13Massachusetts23.7%18%
+5.8%
14Nebraska10.5%4.9%
+5.6%
15Vermont21.6%16.5%
+5.2%
16Colorado22%17%
+4.9%
17Ohio14.3%10%
+4.3%
18New Hampshire18.4%14.2%
+4.2%
19Georgia24.1%20.2%
+3.9%
20Missouri17.6%14.5%
+3.1%
21Alaska59.7%56.6%
+3.1%
22Virginia14.9%12%
+2.8%
23Tennessee14.3%11.6%
+2.8%
24New York19.7%17.2%
+2.5%
25Minnesota11.7%9.4%
+2.3%
26Washington10%7.8%
+2.2%
27South Dakota6.6%4.5%
+2.1%
28Kansas12.7%10.7%
+2%
29Iowa9.9%8.2%
+1.7%
30Maryland15.8%14.3%
+1.5%
31Arizona17.3%15.9%
+1.5%
32Florida12.9%11.7%
+1.2%
33Montana15.2%14%
+1.2%
34Delaware13%11.9%
+1.1%
35Arkansas16.6%15.8%
+0.7%
36Pennsylvania24%23.4%
+0.5%
37Kentucky35.6%35.4%
+0.3%
38Texas12.1%11.8%
+0.2%
39Nevada20%19.7%
+0.2%
40Wisconsin34.8%35.7%
-0.9%
41Wyoming9.9%10.9%
-0.9%
42Idaho12.1%13.5%
-1.4%
43North Dakota10.1%12.3%
-2.3%
44Alabama13%15.8%
-2.8%
45New Mexico18.8%21.7%
-2.9%
46Illinois39.1%42.6%
-3.5%
47Oregon17.3%21%
-3.7%
48Mississippi20.1%28.4%
-8.3%
N/AHawaiiN/AN/A
N/A
N/AUtahN/AN/A
N/A

Table 4: State Pension Rankings by Asset Allocation Risk

RankStateAlt Assets %
1Georgia
1%
2Alabama
9%
3Oklahoma
11%
4Nevada
12%
5Nebraska
14%
6Kansas
14%
7Idaho
15%
8Delaware
16%
9North Carolina
18%
10Mississippi
20%
11South Dakota
24%
12Illinois
24%
13Minnesota
25%
14Colorado
26%
15New York
27%
16North Dakota
27%
17Wisconsin
27%
18New Jersey
28%
19New Hampshire
29%
20Arkansas
29%
21Connecticut
29%
22Florida
30%
23Kentucky
30%
24Ohio
30%
25Vermont
32%
26Montana
35%
27Louisiana
35%
28Pennsylvania
35%
29Rhode Island
36%
30Missouri
37%
31Alaska
37%
32California
37%
33Iowa
37%
34West Virginia
37%
35Massachusetts
37%
36New Mexico
40%
37Tennessee
43%
38South Carolina
43%
39Wyoming
45%
40Michigan
46%
41Virginia
48%
42Texas
49%
43Maryland
50%
44Arizona
50%
45Indiana
55%
46Washington
55%
47Oregon
58%
48Maine
58%
49Hawaii
60%
N/AUtah
N/A

Table 5: State Pension Rankings by Probability of Hitting Assumed Return

RankStateARR Probability
1Michigan
68%
2Idaho
63%
3Maine
63%
4Virginia
63%
5Maryland
63%
6Arizona
62%
7Indiana
62%
8Connecticut
61%
9New York
61%
10Kentucky
61%
11North Dakota
60%
12Washington
60%
13Tennessee
59%
14Wisconsin
59%
15New Jersey
58%
16Oregon
58%
17Florida
58%
18Massachusetts
58%
19Delaware
57%
20Vermont
57%
21Iowa
57%
22Rhode Island
56%
23Texas
56%
24Utah
56%
25California
55%
26Illinois
55%
27Pennsylvania
55%
28New Mexico
54%
29Missouri
54%
30Oklahoma
54%
31Minnesota
53%
32South Dakota
53%
33Ohio
53%
34South Carolina
53%
35West Virginia
53%
36Mississippi
52%
37New Hampshire
52%
38North Carolina
51%
39Arkansas
51%
40Montana
51%
41Nebraska
51%
42Alaska
51%
43Colorado
48%
44Kansas
48%
45Georgia
48%
46Louisiana
44%
47Alabama
44%
48Nevada
43%
N/AHawaii
N/A
N/AWyoming
N/A